Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
Interference Index

Application Number Inventor Title of Invention Assignee Real Party in Interest Interference # Declared Date Decided Date Precedential Decisions Non Precedential Decisions District Court Decision Federal Circuit Court Decision
08/196,339 Tamai - - - 103,662 1997/05/09 (CAFC 2004/05/04/) - - -Stevens v. Tamai
- Taskett - - - 103,894 - 09/26/2003 - - -Taskett v. Dentlinger
08/162,984 Bouchard et al. - - - 103,675 - 10/22/2003 - - -Chen et al. v. Bouchard et al.
08/443,184 Velander - - - 104,242 - 11/05/2003 - - -Velander et al. v. Garner et al.
08/057,198 Schendel - Genetics Institute - 103,443 - 1996/05/14 - - -Schendel v. Curtis et al.
07/207,655 Kopf - - - 103,096 1994/09/29 1996/09/24 - - -Guinn v. Kopf
07/442,240 Kopf - - - 103,096 1994/09/29 1996/09/24 - - -Guinn v. Kopf
07/865,781 Rowe et al. - - - 103,157 - 1997/04/21 - - -Rowe v. Dror et al.
07/748,147 Davidson et al. - - - 103,051 - 1997/06/13 - - -Gechter et al. v. Davidson et al.
07/627,975 Wu - - - 102,654 1991/08/08 1997/11/06 - - -Wu vs. Wang
07/473,541 Boone Variable Function Programmed Systems - - 102,598 - 1998/06/17 - - -Hyatt v. Boone
07/412,527 Hirose - - - 102,567 - 1998/11/28 - - -Bruning v. Hirose
- A.S. - - - 104,AAA 1998/11/13 1998/12/02 (Paper No.10) A.S. v. B.R. - --
08/434,105 Fischhoff et al. - Monsanto Company - 103,781 1996/11/07 1998/12/9 - - -Barton et al. v. Adang et al.
07/827,906 Barton et al. - Agracetus - 103,781 1996/11/07 1998/12/9 - - -Barton et al. v. Adang et al.
- Bamberger, et al. - - - 103,844 - 1998/2/18 - Bamberger v. Cheruvu (Paper 405) --
- Cheruvu, et al. - - - 103,844 - 1998/2/18 - Bamberger v. Cheruvu (Paper 409) --
- XX - - - 1xx,xxx - 1999/04/01 - XX v. YY --
- YY - - - 1xx,xxx - 1999/04/01 - XX v. YY --
- R.C. - - - 104,EEE - 1999/04/16 (Paper 143) R.C. v. T.Y. (Paper 143) - --
- T.Y. - - - 104,EEE - 1999/04/16 (Paper 143) R.C. v. T.Y. (Paper 143) - --
08/678,686 Fujita, et al. - - Mitsubishi Chemical Corporati 104,284 1998/11/04 1999/11/16 Spaleck v. Fujita Papers 73 and 74, Papers 82 and 83 - --
08/678,686 Fujita, et al. - - Mitsubishi Chemical Corporati 104,283 1998/11/04 1999/11/16 Winter v. Fujita Papers 73 and 74, Papers 82 and 83 - --
08/574,371 Unger, et al. - Imarx Pharmaceutical Group - 104,238 1998/11/09 1999/12/06 - Anderson et al. v. Unger et a --
07/057,100 Evans et al. - - - 102,727 1991/11/15 2000/02/02 - - -Eaton v. Evans et al.
07/798,627 Gartside et al. - - - 103,255 1994/02/04 2000/02/15 - - -In Re Gartside et al.
- McIntyre - - - 104,461 - 2000/03/16 (Paper 29) Lee v. McIntyre (Paper 29) - --
- Matsushima, et al. - - United States of America 104,354 - 2000/05/02 (Paper 45) Matsushima v. H.A. (Paper 45) - --
- H.A. - - Novartis AG and the Canton of Berne 104,354 - 2000/05/02 (Paper 45) Matsushima v. H.A. (Paper 45) - --
07/552,719 Singh Use of Alpha Factor Sequences in Yeast Expression Systems Genentech, Inc. - 102,728 - 2000/08/04 Singh v. Brake - -2000/08/04 2003/01/29
- GN - - - 104,vvv 1999/09/10 2000/09/27 (Paper 39) GN v. SW (Paper 39) - --
08/087,388 Gawron-Burke, et al. - - - 103,899 - 2000/11/13 - Gawron-Burke et al. v. Payne et al. Monsanto v. Mycogen-
- D.Y. - - - 104,289 - 2000/11/20 (Paper No. 65) Cromlish v. D.Y.(Paper No.'s 65 & 76) - --
- Cromlish - - - 104,289 - 2000/11/21 (Paper No. 65) Cromlish v. D.Y. (Paper No.'s 65 & 76) - --
07/248,863 Hitzeman et al. - - - 102,989 1992/10/22 2001/03/21 - - -Hitzeman et al. v. Rutter et al.
07/695,325 Dement et al - - - 102,760 - 2001/06/28 - - -Rapoport v. Dement et al.
07/479,693 Rapoport - - - 102,760 - 2001/06/28 - - -Rapoport v. Dement et al.
08/730,025 Nishiyama, et al. - - Three Bond Co., Ltd. 104,539 2000/05/10 2001/08/28 - Wojciak v. Nishiyama (Paper 5 --
09/340,437 Sever - - - 104,722 2001/07/10 2001/11/06 - Sever v. Glickman --
09/123,917 Ellsworth - - - 104,528 2000/04/14 2001/11/20 - Ellsworth v. Moore --
09/157,670 Aguilar - - - 104,572 2001/03/06 2001/11/30 - Aguilar v. Watson --
07/937,893 Brown, et al. - Board of Regents, University of Texas - 103,586 - 2002/01/11 - Barbacid et al. v. Brown et al. -Barbacid et al. v. Brown et al.
07/713,624 Adang et al. - - - 103,324 1994/02/28 2002/04/10 - - -Adang et al. v. Fischhoff et al.
09/225,439 Provencher et al. - - Teradyne, Inc. 104,693 2001/04/30 2002/05/08 - Preputnick v. Provencher --
09/346,852 Yager, et al. - - - 104,718 2001/06/20 2002/06/28 - Kopf-Sill v. Yager --
08/320,785 Yamada, et al. - - - 104,627 2000/10/30 2002/07/10 - Yurek v. Yamada --
07/608,600 Jolley - - - 103,526 - 2002/10/23 - - -In Re Scott T. Jolley
07/608,600 Jolley - - - 103,525 - 2002/10/29 - - -In Re Scott T. Jolley
08/608,502 Rickerby et al. - - - 104,817 - 2002/12/05 - Nagaraj et al. v. Rickerby et al. --
07/813,250 Fischhoff et al. - Monsanto Company - 103,324 1994/02/28 2002/4/10 - - -Adang et al. v. Fischhoff et al.
08/953,550 Berman et al. - - - 104,347 - 2002/5/29 Berman et al. v. Housey - -Berman et al. v. Housey
09/357,445 Strelchenko, et al. - - Infigen, Inc. 104,809 - 2002/6/10 (Paper 26) - Strelchenko v. Campbell (Paper No. 26) --
09/650,194 Campbell, et al. - - Dept. for Environment, Food & 104,809 - 2002/6/10 (Paper 26) - Strelchenko v. Campbell (Paper No. 26) --
08/452,527 Manning - - - 104,199 - 2002/7/12 - - -Manning v. Paradis
**/***,*** Wang et al. - - Cell Genesys, Inc. 104,825 2002/03/08 2003/01/30 (Paper No. 75) - Wang et al. v. Kovesdi et al. (Paper 75) --
08/246,259 Gordon et al. - Genzyme Corp., and US Nat'l Institute of Health Genzyme Corp., and US Nat'l Institute of Health 105,004 - 2003/02/03 - Deboer et al. v. Gordon et al. --
09/185,663 Lilly - - - 101,100 - 2003/07/03 - - -Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington
08/788,799 Roberts - - Proctor & Gamble 105,019 2002/09/17 2003/09/30 (paper 72) - (Paper 72) --
08/258,416 Kovedsi et al. - - Genvec, Inc. 104,825 2002/03/08 2003/1/30 - Wang et al. v. Kovesdi et al. --
08/029,819 Chen - - - 103,675 - 2003/10/23 - - -Chen et al. v. Bouchard et al.
09/262,831 Knight - - TeraStor 105,058 2002/11/25 2003/10/29 (Paper 41) - (Paper 41) --
09/508,057 Bingel et al. - - - 104,818 2002/05/28 2003/12/09(I) ;2004/03/22(II) - Sullivan v. Bingel -Sullivan(I)Sullivan (II)
10/234,659 Stampa et al. Process for the preparation of loratadine - - 105,069 & 105,212 - 6/27/05 Stampa et al. v. Jackson - --
09/525,894 Jackson - - - 105,069 & 105,212 - 6/27/05 Stampa et al. v. Jackson - --
09/964,383 Johnson Method of Treating Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Smithkline Beecham Corporation - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
09/984,083 Johnson Method of Treating Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Smithkline Beecham Corporation - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
08/460,296 Rasmusson et al. - - - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
09/371,683 Leiden et al. - - - 105,217 6/10/04 7/11/05 - Hammond et al. v. Leiden et al. (Decision) (Final Judgment) (Errata) -Leiden v. Hammond 06-1023