Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
Interference Index

Application Number Inventor Title of Invention Assignee Real Party in Interest Interference # Declared Date Decided Date Precedential Decisions Non Precedential Decisions District Court Decision Federal Circuit Court Decision
**/***,*** Scott - - - 104,763 - - - Scott v. Gbur --
**/***,*** Wang et al. - - Cell Genesys, Inc. 104,825 2002/03/08 2003/01/30 (Paper No. 75) - Wang et al. v. Kovesdi et al. (Paper 75) --
05/756,332 Hillman - - Incyte Pharmaceuticals 104,436 - - Hillman v. Shyamala - --
06/786,999 Elson, et al. - Baxter Intl Inc. - 103,146 - - - Barker v. Elson et al. --
06/917,027 Beachy, et al. - The Monsanto Company and Wash - 104,286 - - Johnston v. Beachy - --
07/057,100 Evans et al. - - - 102,727 1991/11/15 2000/02/02 - - -Eaton v. Evans et al.
07/205,419 Cabilly, et al. - - Genentech, Inc. 102,572 1991/02/28 - - Cabilly v. Boss --
07/207,655 Kopf - - - 103,096 1994/09/29 1996/09/24 - - -Guinn v. Kopf
07/209,807 Inoue, et al. - Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki K - 102,644 - - Reitz v. Inoue - --
07/219,522 Reitz - United States of America, as - 102,644 - - Reitz v. Inoue - --
07/248,863 Hitzeman et al. - - - 102,989 1992/10/22 2001/03/21 - - -Hitzeman et al. v. Rutter et al.
07/412,527 Hirose - - - 102,567 - 1998/11/28 - - -Bruning v. Hirose
07/442,240 Kopf - - - 103,096 1994/09/29 1996/09/24 - - -Guinn v. Kopf
07/450,150 Shafferman - Dept. of the Army - 103,801 - - - Bolognesi et al. v. Shafferma --
07/473,541 Boone Variable Function Programmed Systems - - 102,598 - 1998/06/17 - - -Hyatt v. Boone
07/479,693 Rapoport - - - 102,760 - 2001/06/28 - - -Rapoport v. Dement et al.
07/552,719 Singh Use of Alpha Factor Sequences in Yeast Expression Systems Genentech, Inc. - 102,728 - 2000/08/04 Singh v. Brake - -2000/08/04 2003/01/29
07/608,600 Jolley - - - 103,525 - 2002/10/29 - - -In Re Scott T. Jolley
07/608,600 Jolley - - - 103,526 - 2002/10/23 - - -In Re Scott T. Jolley
07/627,975 Wu - - - 102,654 1991/08/08 1997/11/06 - - -Wu vs. Wang
07/667,711 Arnold - - - 103,520 - - - Beach v. Arnold --
07/695,325 Dement et al - - - 102,760 - 2001/06/28 - - -Rapoport v. Dement et al.
07/713,624 Adang et al. - - - 103,324 1994/02/28 2002/04/10 - - -Adang et al. v. Fischhoff et al.
07/739,113 Bhattacharyya, et al. - Nalco Chemical Company - 104,202 - - - Bhattacharyya et al. v. Waldm --
07/748,147 Davidson et al. - - - 103,051 - 1997/06/13 - - -Gechter et al. v. Davidson et al.
07/759,212 Lofgren, et al. - - Sandisk Corporation andWester 103,607 - - - Assar v. Lofgren et al. --
07/775,187 Furman et al. - - - 104,523 - - - Furman et al. v. Cheng --
07/798,627 Gartside et al. - - - 103,255 1994/02/04 2000/02/15 - - -In Re Gartside et al.
07/813,250 Fischhoff et al. - Monsanto Company - 103,324 1994/02/28 2002/4/10 - - -Adang et al. v. Fischhoff et al.
07/827,906 Barton et al. - Agracetus - 103,781 1996/11/07 1998/12/9 - - -Barton et al. v. Adang et al.
07/865,781 Rowe et al. - - - 103,157 - 1997/04/21 - - -Rowe v. Dror et al.
07/883,903 Brashears - Gencor Industries - 103,322 - - - Gencor v. Linkletter et al. --
07/937,893 Brown, et al. - Board of Regents, University of Texas - 103,586 - 2002/01/11 - Barbacid et al. v. Brown et al. -Barbacid et al. v. Brown et al.
07/963,308 Beach - - - 103,520 - - - Beach v. Arnold --
08/005,197 Ljung - - - 103,908 - - - Bernstein v. Ljung --
08/029,819 Chen - - - 103,675 - 2003/10/23 - - -Chen et al. v. Bouchard et al.
08/033,311 Hartsell - - - 104,699 2001/04/27 - - Spalding v. Hartsell --
08/057,198 Schendel - Genetics Institute - 103,443 - 1996/05/14 - - -Schendel v. Curtis et al.
08/068,393 Adams - Beckman Instruments, Inc. - 103,883 - - - Bhatnagar et al. v. Adams --
08/073,028 Bolognesi, et al. - Duke University, Durham, NC - 103,801 - - - Bolognesi et al. v. Shafferma --
08/087,388 Gawron-Burke, et al. - - - 103,899 - 2000/11/13 - Gawron-Burke et al. v. Payne et al. Monsanto v. Mycogen-
08/098,178 Hills, et al. - - - 104,072 - - - Beeley et al. v. Fenton et al. --
08/123,864 Tsui - - HSC Research Development Corp. and Regents of Univ. of Michigan 103,933 - - - Gregory v. Collins v. Tsui --
08/129,426 Bolkan, et al. - Church & Dwight Co., Inc. - 103,944 - - - Bolkan et al. v. Austin et al --
08/162,984 Bouchard et al. - - - 103,675 - 10/22/2003 - - -Chen et al. v. Bouchard et al.
08/168,621 Bhatnagar, et al. - Oncor, Inc. - 103,883 - - - Bhatnagar et al. v. Adams --
08/185,928 Frazer, et al. - CSL Limited (Australia) and U - 104,773 - - - Rose v. Frazer (Paper 73) --
08/196,090 Goldmann - - - 103,692 - - - Brennan et al. v. Goldmann --
08/196,339 Tamai - - - 103,662 1997/05/09 (CAFC 2004/05/04/) - - -Stevens v. Tamai
08/203,716 Black, et al. - Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorp - 104,058 - - - Black et al. v. Howard et al. --
08/207,309 Rose, et al. - The University of Rochester,S - 104,773 - - - Rose v. Frazer (Paper 73) --
08/208,593 Waldman, et al. - - - 104,202 - - - Bhattacharyya et al. v. Waldm --
08/229,050 Cornelissen, et al. - Rijksuniversiteit TE Leiden M - 103,724 - - - Boller et al. v. Cornelissen --
08/245,524 Inagaki - Supreme Plastic Ltd - 103,640 1996/06/21 - - Ausnit v. Inagaki --
08/246,259 Gordon et al. - Genzyme Corp., and US Nat'l Institute of Health Genzyme Corp., and US Nat'l Institute of Health 105,004 - 2003/02/03 - Deboer et al. v. Gordon et al. --
08/252,778 Tsui - - HSC Research Development Corp. and Regents of Univ. of Michigan 103,933 - - - Gregory v. Collins v. Tsui --
08/258,416 Kovedsi et al. - - Genvec, Inc. 104,825 2002/03/08 2003/1/30 - Wang et al. v. Kovesdi et al. --
08/299,931 Adams ,   et al. - - ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 104,452 - - - Baker v. Adams et al. --
08/311,290 Shelley, et al. - - SmithKline Beecham Corporation 104,709 2001/06/01 - - Ondeyka v. Shelley --
08/311,665 Gregory - - Genzyme Corporation 103,882 - - - Gregory v. Tsui --
08/320,785 Yamada, et al. - - - 104,627 2000/10/30 2002/07/10 - Yurek v. Yamada --
08/320,793 Singer, et al. - - PPG Industries Inc. 103,711 - - - Singer v. Rehfuss --
08/322,658 Austin, et al. - - - 103,944 - - - Bolkan et al. v. Austin et al. --
08/324,526 Beach - - - 104,344 - - - Beach v. Arnold --
08/329,799 Boller, et al. - CibaGeigy Corporation - 103,724 - - - Boller et al. v. Cornelissen --
08/349,741 Foster ,   et al - Continental Acquisition Corp. - 104,036 - - - Barriac et al. v. Foster et al. --
08/351,328 Howard, et al. - Merck & Co., Inc. - 104,058 - - - Black et al. v. Howard et al. --
08/379,802 Bartley, et al. - Amgen Inc. - 104,022 - - - Bartley et al. v. Cerretti v. Caras et al. --
08/396,946 Cerretti - Immunex Corporation - 104,022 - - - Bartley et al. v. Cerretti v. Caras et al. --
08/434,105 Fischhoff et al. - Monsanto Company - 103,781 1996/11/07 1998/12/9 - - -Barton et al. v. Adang et al.
08/435,032 Rose - - Yale University 104,421 - - - Wertz et al. v. Rose --
08/443,184 Velander - - - 104,242 - 11/05/2003 - - -Velander et al. v. Garner et al.
08/452,527 Manning - - - 104,199 - 2002/7/12 - - -Manning v. Paradis
08/459,029 Arnold - - - 104,344 - - - Beach v. Arnold --
08/460,296 Rasmusson et al. - - - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
08/461,318 - - - Gillette Company 104,482 2000/01/12 - - Tseng v. Doroodian-Shoja --
08/461,753 Shima, et al. - - - 103,809 - - - Bloink et al. v. Shima et al. --
08/463,960 Cheng - - - 104,523 - - - Furman et al. v. Cheng --
08/465,675 Charlton - - - 104,148 - - Charlton v. Rosenstein - --
08/469,630 Tsui - - HSC Research Development Crop. and Regents of Univ. of Michigan 104,228 - - - Gregory v. Riordan v. Tsui --
08/470,534 Gregory - - Genzyme Corporation 104,228 - - - Gregory v. Riordan v. Tsui --
08/479,658 - - - Lacks Industries, Inc. 103,836 - - - - -McKechnie Vehicle Components USA, Inc. v. Lacks Industries, Inc.
08/559,072 Leveen - - - 104,290 - - - LeVeen v. Edwards (Paper 351) --
08/574,371 Unger, et al. - Imarx Pharmaceutical Group - 104,238 1998/11/09 1999/12/06 - Anderson et al. v. Unger et a --
08/585,485 Griggs, et al. - - - 103,729 1997/10/03 - Griggs v. Rose - --
08/608,502 Rickerby et al. - - - 104,817 - 2002/12/05 - Nagaraj et al. v. Rickerby et al. --
08/609,702 Eppstein, et al. - - Roche Bioscience 103,708 - - - Anderson v. Eppstein --
08/628,605 Cameron, et al. - - - 104,104 - - - Eli Lilly & Co. v. Cameron --
08/665,679 Okajima - - - 104,193 1998/04/30 - - - -Okajima v. Bourdeau
08/666,164 Genise - - - 104,834 04/26/2002 - - (Paper 66) --
08/676,531 Heeres, et al. - - - 104,079 - - Gray v. Heeres - --
08/676,928 Bourdeau - - - 104,193 1998/04/30 - - - -Okajima v. Bourdeau
08/678,686 Fujita, et al. - - Mitsubishi Chemical Corporati 104,284 1998/11/04 1999/11/16 Spaleck v. Fujita Papers 73 and 74, Papers 82 and 83 - --
08/678,686 Fujita, et al. - - Mitsubishi Chemical Corporati 104,283 1998/11/04 1999/11/16 Winter v. Fujita Papers 73 and 74, Papers 82 and 83 - --
08/711,571 Tomalia, et al. - - Dow Chemical Co. 104,274 - - Wolf v. Tamalia - --
08/723,315 Hoeller - - Zellweger Luwa Ag 104,025 - - Nevel v. Hoeller - --
08/730,025 Nishiyama, et al. - - Three Bond Co., Ltd. 104,539 2000/05/10 2001/08/28 - Wojciak v. Nishiyama (Paper 5 --
08/732,897 Fitzmaurice, et al. - - Merck & Co., Inc. 104,370 - - - Bennet v. Fitzmaurice et al. --
08/742,280 Oldroyd - - - 104,158 - - - Althaus v. Oldroyd --
08/742,480 Noelle - - - 104,415 - - - Noelle v. Lederman -CAFC
08/742,480 Noelle - - The Trustees of Dartmouth College and IDEC Corp. 104,724 - - - (Papers 89 & 92) (Paper 33) --
08/743,858 Sturman - - - 105,016 - - - - -Gibson et al. v. Sturman
08/766,239 Caras, et al. - - - 104,022 - - - Bartley et al. v. Cerretti v. Caras et al. --
08/774,510 Burk - - Novartis Corporation 104,462 - - Adams v. Burk- --
08/788,799 Roberts - - Proctor & Gamble 105,019 2002/09/17 2003/09/30 (paper 72) - (Paper 72) --
08/818,964 Okada - - Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg. Co., L 104,311 2000/02/16 - Sauer, Inc. v. Kazanki Kokyukoki Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki --
08/886,572 Shyamala - - Chiron Corporation 104,436 - - Hillman v. Shyamala - --
08/904,852 Anderson, et al. - - - 104,446 1999/09/22 - Anderson v. Dionex Corp. - --
08/909,611 Cabilly, et al. - - - 104,532 - - Glaxco Wellcome, Inc. v. Ca - --
08/923,783 Roser - - Quadrant Healthcare (U.K.) Limited 104,727 - - - Bronshtein v. Roser (Paper 55) --
08/953,550 Berman et al. - - - 104,347 - 2002/5/29 Berman et al. v. Housey - -Berman et al. v. Housey
08/968,519 Garbe, et al. - - Minnesota Mining and Manufact 104,263 - - Therriault v. Garbe - --
08/989,362 Gorman et al. - - Schering Corporation 104,336 - - - Boyle v. Gorman et al. --
09/007,306 Hillman - - Incyte Pharmaceuticals 104,436 - - Hillman v. Shyamala - --
09/049,225 Waterman - - American Cyanamid Corporation 104,500 2000/02/09 - Waterman v. Birbaum - --
09/059,373 - - Tropix, Inc. Tropix, Inc. 104,459 - - Tropix, Inc. v. Lumigen - --
09/069,847 Han, et al - - Georgetown University 104,670 - - - Han v. Livak --
09/071,174 Swarup, et al. - - PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. 104,465 - - - Argyropoulos et al. v. Swarup --
09/090,754 - - - Fordham University 104,761 - - - University of New Mexico v. Fordham University --
09/101,663 Stiller - - - 105,044 - - Stiller v. Heid
09/122,721 Bachschmid, et al. - - - 104,632 - - - Bachschmid et al. v. Smallwoo --
09/123,917 Ellsworth - - - 104,528 2000/04/14 2001/11/20 - Ellsworth v. Moore --
09/136,664 Maienfisch, et al. - Novartis Corporation - 104,525 - - Shiokawa v. Maienfisch - --
09/157,670 Aguilar - - - 104,572 2001/03/06 2001/11/30 - Aguilar v. Watson --
09/185,663 - - - Eli Lilly & Co. 104,733 - - - University of Washington v. Eli Lilly & Co. --
09/185,663 Lilly - - - 101,100 - 2003/07/03 - - -Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington
09/197,761 Alt, et al. - - Phillips Petroleum Company 104,626 - - - Rohrmann v. Alt --
09/225,439 Provencher et al. - - Teradyne, Inc. 104,693 2001/04/30 2002/05/08 - Preputnick v. Provencher --
09/255,744 Keagy et al. - - Identix Inc. 104,649 - - - Zhou et al. v. Keagy et al. --
09/262,831 Knight - - TeraStor 105,058 2002/11/25 2003/10/29 (Paper 41) - (Paper 41) --
09/289,390 Genise - - - 104,835 04/26/2002 - - (Paper 71) --
09/294,964 Bilstad et al. - - - 104,832 - - - - -Bilstad et al. v. Wakalopulos et al.
09/299,426 Johnston ,   et al. - Johnston; Stephen A.;Cornell - 104,286 - - Johnston v. Beachy - --
09/322,021 Armitage - - Immunex Corp. 104,724 - - - (Papers 89 & 92)(Paper 33) --
09/328,080 McNulty et al. - - DePuy Orothopaedics, Inc. 104,804 - - - Rohr v. McNulty et al. --
09/340,437 Sever - - - 104,722 2001/07/10 2001/11/06 - Sever v. Glickman --
09/346,852 Yager, et al. - - - 104,718 2001/06/20 2002/06/28 - Kopf-Sill v. Yager --
09/357,445 Strelchenko, et al. - - Infigen, Inc. 104,809 - 2002/6/10 (Paper 26) - Strelchenko v. Campbell (Paper No. 26) --
09/371,683 Leiden et al. - - - 105,217 6/10/04 7/11/05 - Hammond et al. v. Leiden et al. (Decision) (Final Judgment) (Errata) -Leiden v. Hammond 06-1023
09/488,960 Herman - - - 104,812 - - - Herman v. Barnes et al. --
09/508,057 Bingel et al. - - - 104,818 2002/05/28 2003/12/09(I) ;2004/03/22(II) - Sullivan v. Bingel -Sullivan(I)Sullivan (II)
09/525,894 Jackson - - - 105,069 & 105,212 - 6/27/05 Stampa et al. v. Jackson - --
09/592,243 Reynolds et al. - - - 105,029 - - - Sanada v. Reynolds et al. --
09/650,194 Campbell, et al. - - Dept. for Environment, Food & 104,809 - 2002/6/10 (Paper 26) - Strelchenko v. Campbell (Paper No. 26) --
09/964,383 Johnson Method of Treating Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Smithkline Beecham Corporation - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
09/984,083 Johnson Method of Treating Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Smithkline Beecham Corporation - 104,646 - 6/27/05 - - -Rasmusson et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
10/234,659 Stampa et al. Process for the preparation of loratadine - - 105,069 & 105,212 - 6/27/05 Stampa et al. v. Jackson - --
10/273,518 Fan - - - 105,162 2003/11/20 - - Lanuza v. Fan (Decision) Lanuza v. Fan (Judgment) --
N/A Liotta - - - 104,333 - - - Dionne v. Liotta --